最近一次發表時間:2007-12-26 08:06:33 | 點擊數目:10788 首頁
   
  The use of plastic bags in HK  
 

Evaluation for Task 1

 

 

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

Score

1) Design

The design of the questionnaire failed to cover the aspects required and with limited respondents filled it.

The design of the questionnaire covers limited aspects required and with limited respondents filled it.

The design of the questionnaire covers most of the aspects required and with adequate respondents filled it.

The design of the questionnaire covers all the aspects required and with adequate respondents filled it.

30%

2) Content

The presentation is lack of content and some of the findings are not valid. The scope of finding is narrow.

The content of the presentation is fair and the scope of finding is not broad enough.

The content of the presentation is rich and the most of the findings are valid and reliable.

The content of the presentation is very rich and the findings are valid and reliable.

20%

3) Visual Aids

The use of Power point in the presentation fails to help with the presentation. It reflects the lack of skills in using the powerpoint.

The use of Power point in the presentation is so-so. There is room for improvements. It does not help with the presentation greatly.

The use of Power point generally enhances the presentation on the whole. There is some room for  further improvements

The use of power point effectively enhances the presentation with clear slides, effects and charts.

15%

4) Organization

It reflects a lack of preparation in the presentation. The audience can hardly follow the sequence of the presentation.

The preparation in advance could be more for the presentation. The sequence of the presentation is a little bit messy.

It shows much preparation work for the presentation and the sequence is coherent.

It shows a lot of preparation work for the presentation. The sequence is coherent and smooth. It is reader-friendly.

20%

5) Delivery

Students simply read from the script without eye-contact. The speech is full of grammatical mistakes.

The presentation skills are generally needs improvement in most parts (language/ eye contact and voice and pace)

The speech is fluent with limited mistakes and with eye contact and at moderate speed.

Students show strength in the accuracy, fluency of the speech. The eye contact and other non-verbal cues help with the presentation.

15%

 

 

Evaluation for Task 2

 

 

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

Score

1) Content

Little and irrelevant content

Some reasonable arguments

without much support

Some Sounding arguments with convincing support

A lot of sounding arguments with convincing support

35%

2) Fluency

Disorganized, without much intonation and appropriate pausing

 Some organization and efforts in choosing the right intonation and pausing

Quite fluent with some  organization, and mostly appropriate pausing

Fluent with good organization, appropriate pausing

15%

3) Pronunciation

Most of the words are not pronounced correctly, and without intonation

Pronounce some of the words correctly and meaningfully and without much intonation

Pronounce most of the words correctly and meaningfully with efforts shown in using the right intonation

Pronounce all the words correctly and meaningfully with right intonation

15%

2) Grammar

A number of grammatical mistakes which hinder understanding

Quite a number of grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

A few grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

Few grammatical mistakes and do not hinder understanding

15%

3) Creativity

Only old ideas are iterated

Original but infeasible ideas

Some feasible and original ideas

Quite a  number of feasible and original ideas

20%

 

 

Evaluation for Task 3

a) Flow charts

 

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

Score

1) Content

Little and irrelevant content

Enough content with some irrelevant ideas

Enough and relevent content

Rich and relevant content

50%

2) Grammar

A number of grammatical mistakes which hinder understanding

Quite a number of grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

Some grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

A few grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

25%

3) Creativity

Ideas shown are not new and feaible

Ideas shown are new but not feasible

A few ideas shown are new, feasible and original

A number of Ideas shown are new, feasible and original

25%

 

b) Proposal writing

 

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

Score

1) Content

Little and irrelevant content

Enough content with some irrelevant ideas

Enough and relevent content

Rich and relevant content

50%

2) Grammar

A number of grammatical mistakes which hinder understanding

Quite a number of grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

Some grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

A few grammatical mistakes but do not hinder understanding

25%

3) Organisation

Difficult to follow

Fairly easy to follow

Well-organised

Well-organised and with logical sequence

25%

 

 



Disclaimer: This is a user-contributed webpage hosted in the Centre for the Advancement of Information Technology in Education, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The Centre is not responsible for the contents therein, and any loss or damage caused.