最近一次發表時間:2009-06-02 16:15:32 | 點擊數目:10064 首頁
   
  12S-MakMeiLin-Action Green Campus  
 

The evaluation consists of two parts: the script and the video of TV commercial

Part 1: The script (10 marks) - assessed by the teacher

CATEGORY

Outstanding

Good

Satisfactory

Yet to Improve

Script

(30%)

Script is complete and it is clear what each actor will say and do. Entries and exits are scripted as are important movements. Script is quite professional.

Script is mostly complete. It is clear what each actor will say and do. Script is shows planning.

Script has a few major flaws. It is not always clear what the actors are to say and do. Script shows an attempt at planning, but seems incomplete.

There is no script. Actors are expected to invent what they say and do as they go along.

Amount of Information

(20%)

All topics are addressed and all questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each.

All topics are addressed and most questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each.

All topics are addressed, and most questions answered with 1 sentence about each.

One or more topics were not addressed.

Quality of Information

(20%)

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples.

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples.

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given.

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.

Mechanics

(30%)

No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors.

Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

 

Part 2: Video of TV commercial (10 marks) - assessed by the peers 

CATEGORY

Outstanding

Good

Satisfactory

Yet to Improve

Content

(20%)

Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.

Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.

Originality

(30%)

Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.

Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.

Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.

Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.

Presentation

(30%)

Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time.

Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.

Teamwork

(20%)

Students meet and discuss regularly. All students contribute to the discussion and all are listened to respectfully. All team members contribute a fair share of the work.

Students meet and discuss regularly. Most students contribute to the discussion and are listened to respectfully. All team members contribute a fair share of the work.

A couple of team meetings are held. Most students contribute to the discussion and are listened to respectfully. All team members contribute a fair share of the work.

Meetings are not held AND/OR some team members do not contribute a fair share of the work.

 

 

 



Disclaimer: This is a user-contributed webpage hosted in the Centre for the Advancement of Information Technology in Education, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The Centre is not responsible for the contents therein, and any loss or damage caused.